I love it when people abuse the power to knit.
With the sunglasses, it looks downright sinister, doesn’t it? Like this is the mask people would have been wearing at the end of the movie if V for Vendetta had been about the Unabomber.
I love how people are going crazy weird things with formerly staid and respectable home handicrafts. People are knitting all kinds of weird things, including starting vulva knitting circles, and some of them are even using knitting as a form of protest. Radicalized knitters. I love it.
Next : rug hooking used to make WMD’s!

World : UN censors The Gun Sculpture
Jul 25
Posted by MegaWordMan in Arts, Canada, News, World | 1 Comment
There’s a brouhaha brewing over a fairly cool piece of art that’s been on display all over the world, but somehow got changed by someone when it came time to display it at the UN.
Click here for a fairly good picture of the work. I like it, myself. The idea of making an anti-violence statement by melting and fusing a lot of guns, landmines, and other death machines together is not startlingly original, but the execution is, I think, both effective and darkly attractive. The contrast between the cube shape and the dark uniform color with the extremely varied and mechanistic texture, and the way the melting, shredding, and fusion conveys the idea of terrible violence, yet the cube makes it seem like simple compacted trash, makes for a strong effect on the viewer. It manages to covey the feeling of “weapon”, “violence”, and “war” in a terrible and awe inspiring way.
It’s cool art.
But apparently, according to its Canadian sculptors (Edmonton’s Sandra Bromley and Wallis Kendal), the work is meant to be accompanied by 114 photo panels depicting victims of violence from all over the world. And that’s how it’s been displayed all over the world until now, when at some point after being put on display at the Academic Council of the United Nations in Vienna, the panels were taken down, leaving just the cube itself on display.
The artists are calling this “blatant censorship”, which it is, if uses the broadest possible definition of censorship. But it’s a loaded word and should not be throw around lightly or it begins to lose all meaning.
I’ve not seen the photo panels, but seeing as they depict victims of violence, I am guessing they are pretty unpleasant and depressing. The act of censorship may have been motivated by something as simple as someone at ACUN getting tired of looking at the undoubtedly bloody and horrifying things. That’s not the sort of thing that should happen in the world of art, where we’re all assumed to be grownups who can make up our own mind if we want to see upsetting and terrible things, but it’s not a nefarious attempt by shadowy forces to restrict freedom of speech and enforce a monolithic hegemony of conformity on a helpless and sheeplike public consciousness. It might have been a simple bit of editorializing by some mid-level ACUN flunkie who is now busily fading so hard into the woodwork they’re in danger of becoming wood stain and who is perfectly happy to have all these academic feathers flying as long as none of the blame lands on THEM.
It’s good that we maintain a healthy paranoia about censorship. As I see it, it’s better to be a little too worried about it than not quite worried enough. But I find it exceedingly tiresome when artists and writers shout CENSORSHIP like they’re being raped at gunpoint every time someone dares interfere with their works. We can’t go crying wolf every time we see a puppy. There has to be ways of solving these sorts of dispute without breaking out the big guns and invoking the spirit (if nto the specifics) of Godwin all the time.
Otherwise, when that wolf really does show up, people will just assume it must be just another puppy, and by the time they realize their error, it will be too late.
Tags: art, censorship, United Nations