Well, as much as I normally cordially loathe The London Sun for their blatant yellow journalism, screechingly shrill editorial voice, and a writing style that makes me want to find the person who wrote that smarmy pile of crap and whack them about with a good solid umbrella…. I have to admit, they done good.
There are times when having the morals and restraint of baying hounds out for blood actually turns out to be useful for something other than making the lives of famous people miserable, and in this case, that thing is hunting down escaped Nazis.
Sure, they are only doing it for the lurid headline and cheap feeling of moral superiority, but regardless of their motives, they did a good thing.
I am normally a person who adds a fair bit of mercy to his hot cups of justice. I dislike the punitive mindset strongly, I do not think justice and vengeance are ever the same thing, and I think the justice system’s main job is finding out the truth and putting people who have identified themselves as dangerous someplace where they can do less harm, not punishment or revenge. Just protection.
But there can be no escape from crimes against humanity. I do not care how old, how feeble, how contrite, how mournful, how photogenic, or how exemplary this Nazi is, he needs to go to jail for his crimes. The message has to be firmly reinforced that for some things, there is no statute of limitations, no loopholes, no time off for good behaviour. You will never be safe, never be able to relax, never be able to know, for sure, that the authorities will not show up tomorrow morning and take you away from your friends and your family and the life you have built and make your shame known to the world when they take you to court and make you face your crimes, and pay the price.
This is one of those rare cases where I think keeping the person alive is more cruel, but more just, than execution. Their terrible crimes should be listed right next to their faces on every newspaper and television news program in the world so that everyone knows what they did, and then they should be left to rot in prison so they can know the shame for as long as possible.
So the old guy is 88. So what? The people he killed are still dead. That has not changed.
Pragmatically speaking, I have no idea if the thought of being pursued for their entire lives by the police of the entire world will ever cause someone to decide against committing a crime against humanity. As I understand it, these things generally happen in the heat of the moment, or from the influence of a system gone completely insane, and often the real motive for doing what you are told, even when it is a horrible crime and you know it, is the desire not to be the next one to die. Fascist regimes are notoriously conformist, and I can understand how someone might do terrible things out of a combination of the fear of consequences and the urge to conform.
But crimes against humanity transcend that. There has to be some kind of accounting for them, no matter how long it takes, if for no other reason than to be the public response, the active arm of the public’s reaction to these crimes.
People have to believe that there are some things you just plain cannot get away with.
News : Latest news in eggs
Aug 30
Posted by MegaWordMan in Odd, World | 1 Comment
According to this article, the egg industry is now blaming the victims of their tainted eggs for not cooking their eggs for long enough.
Really, egg people? REALLY? Here’s the quote :
REALLY, Egg Guy Mitch “Egg” Head? Over 1400 people have gotten sick from your damned eggs. You are saying every single one of them undercooked their eggs? You are sure of that, so sure that you are willing to risk the worst kind of PR, the blaming-the-victim kind?
And all my life, some people have been eating their eggs runny and this is the first time I have heard that this was a horrible risky thing that no sane person should ever do. Are you saying all those times I quite thoroughly enjoyed a soft-boiled egg and toast to dip in, I was risking my very life, and somehow this information just never got to…. anybody?
And the thing is, you have already recalled the eggs, so you are as much as admitting the eggs are at fault. If you thought you were blameless, you should have refused to recall. Now if you have already recalled millions of eggs, it looks like you are two-faced and playing the martyr. This is a very bad reaction
to being caught in public with egg on your face. (Sorry. Had to do it. All stories about this egg thing have got to have at least one egg related put or reference. I am serious. A man came while I was typing this and told me. He was very scary. I’m a little freaked out right now. )
Taking the blame is not fun. There is always the urge to try to weasel out of it, to deflect blame, to refuse to take responsibility for your actions or your mistakes.
But when the public is mad at your industry, there is nothing worse you can do than to try to shift the blame in such a patently transparent and unconvincing manner. It just makes people much angrier, and shifts this from an “oops”, which the public is likely to forgive (after all, mistakes happens, and people do love their eggs, they are unlikely to just stop eating them) into a big “fuck you” to the very people you need to placate, and fast. Not smart.
Honestly, it is wise to take the blame even when you are not entirely sure you are entirely at fault. People will be more likely to forgive and forget, and might even take your side if you show sufficient contrition. This blaming the victim shit is public relations suicide.
So ignore the farmers egging you on, come out of your hard shell, and wise up before you REALLY lay an egg and hurt your whole industry.
(The scary guy made me do that. He is still looking at me. Who let this guy in here, anyhow?)
Tags: eggs, food, recall