Some extremely brave/stupid/insane Russian men take their urban assault vehicle into the heart of a forest fire in order to show us just what Hell might look like.
I have a feeling that this harrowing journey, like so many adventures of man, machine, and muscle against the awesome fury of Mother Nature, began with these fateful words : “Relax, I know a shortcut. ”
Of particular note : when the high-voiced forceful and understandably a tad hysterical man (who turns out to be the driver) freaks the hell out at our camera wielding friend for ROLLING THE FUCKING WINDOW DOWN. Yeah, I know it’s hot in here. That’s because we’re DRIVING THROUGH FUCKING HELL, and when you are DRIVING THROUGH FUCKING HELL, you do NOT ROLL DOWN THE WINDOW!
And what kind of vehicle are they driving? Because that’s a very cool looking dashboard. Looks like the controls on a 1970s sci fi starship.
Of course, I could be wrong, he could be freaking out over, I don’t know, suddenly realizing he left the iron on back home. At his cottage. In this very forest. But I doubt it.
My father told me the story of how he was volunteered into a forest fire fighting crew when he was a young man in central Ontario. He said it was the worst five days of his life, and that includes basic training when he joined the Canadian Armed Forces. All he could remember was the unrelenting heat, being scared and tired all the time, getting first degree burns all over his body, and being ordered around by the older men in what seemed like a never ending war of cutting down trees and brush, digging trenches, forming bucket brigades between bonds and fires, and every now and then, at apparently random intervals, being fed and allowed to sleep. The intervals seemed random both because they partly were (they got their food when the fire allowed) and because the heat, light, and smoke made it impossible to tell day from night. After the first day, none of the others in his crew even talked any more. They were all too tired, too scared, too sore, too hurt. When they tried to sleep, a lot of them woke up screaming from nightmares or just start crying in their sleep, and nobody said anything about it. When the fire was under control and he could finally go back home, he just laid in his bed for two days and swore, over and over again, that he’d rather fight a war than another forest fires.
These days, we have people who fight forest fires for a living, and they have proper equipment, training, and vehicles for the job. Back then, it was pretty ad hoc. You just joined a crew and did what you were told, and never knew why or if anything you did even really helped.
It’s that sort of thing which makes me such a great believer in progress and technology. Life back then was a great dealer harder, dirtier, more dangerous, and less pleasant. We have truly come a long way since then. And if we can come so far in so little time, imagine what we can do in the future to make this a saner, calmer, nicer, cleaner, more compassionate, more humane, more understanding, and more forgiving world.
WTF : Academic Says Nature Documentaries Violate Animals’ Right to Privacy
Apr 30
Posted by MegaWordMan in Politics, Science | 1 Comment
No, seriously. That’s what this guy is saying.
He actually worries that by filming animals in the wild doing what they do, we’re violating their right to privacy.
Now, I’m a pretty big supporter of animal’s rights. I love animals of all sorts and think we have a dity as human beings to live with our fellow critters in as peaceful and un-harmful way as we can.
But worrying about their “privacy” is patently retarded. Animals do not have, want, or need a right to privacy. It’s a concept which simply does not apply to them.
For one thing, it’s not like if I film two wildebeests humping, it’s not like the wildebeest are going to be embarrassed about it. They’ll never even know. It’s not like all their friends will make fun of them and they’ll be humiliated in front of their peers. They don’t even know what a camera is, let alone find it objectionable. You’re not going to see a wildebeest Sean Penn punching lenses out.
For another thing, privacy is pretty much an entirely human concept. Being a social sapient species, we have behavioural taboos which dictate where we do certain things and where we do not. Privacy, then, is required for certain activities. Animals simply do not care. They have no taboos to violate. They can’t feel shame or embarrassment. In fact, they’re not even sentient. You could haul a giant big screen television out into the Serengeti and show the wildebeest the footage of their tryst in surround sound HD, and they wouldn’t even know it was them, let alone be bothered by it.
I think I know where this guy is coming from. For those of us who strongly empathize with animals, it’s quite possible to project all kinds of human attribute onto them. In this case, you might watch our wildebeest rendezvous and, imagining yourself in their shoes (hooves), think “How embarrassing for them! How dare someone film such a private moment in their lives? For shame!”
But animals are not people. They don’t have our same concerns. Part of my animal-rights philosophy is that we must always respect animals for what they are, and not try to project our human concerns onto them. If we do that, then we’re not really loving them for who and what they are, but just turning them into mirrors of ourselves for our own reasons.
What the animals really “want” is to be protected from humans, and nature documentaries are the single best tool for convincing people to respect the rights of animals in the wild. They bring the animals into our lives and make us like them and see them as real and vulnerable, and that, in turn, convinces people to vote for politicians who will protect those animals.
If that involves violating the animals’ “privacy”, you know what? I don’t think they’ll mind.
Tags: animal rights, animals, nature, privacy